Sep 21 2020 35 mins 19
Stare decisis is the doctrine of precedent – that a court should rule the way a previous court did – even when the judges of the second court disagree with the earlier. Is there a way to apply this doctrine without putting the precedent at a higher standing than the Constitution itself? Path to Liberty: September 21, 2020 Subscribe: iTunes | Spotify | Podbean | Google | Stitcher | TuneIn | RSS SHOW LINKS: JOIN TAC Show Archives Subscribe and Review on iTunes State of the Nullification Movement Report Barnett: Stare Decisis for Originalist Judges Supreme Court as a Legislature: A Dissent Federalist 78 Federalist 81 Wurman: Stare Decisis in an Originalist Theory of Law Berger: Government by Judiciary Bigger Problem Underlies Supreme Court Fight The Supreme Court Issues Opinions, not Law ALTERNATE VIDEO SOURCES Watch on LBRY Watch on Brighteon Watch on BitTube Watch on Bitchute Watch on Twitch.tv Watch on Periscope Watch on Facebook Watch on DLive FOLLOW and SUPPORT TAC: Become a Member: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/ Email Newsletter: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/register RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/tacdailydigest Brave: Use Brave Browser for Privacy and Help Support TAC YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/TenthAmendmentCenter Twitter: http://twitter.com/tenthamendment Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tenthamendmentcenter/ Periscope: https://www.periscope.tv/TenthAmendment/ Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/tenthamendmentcenter DLive: https://dlive.tv/TenthAmendmentCenter Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tenthamendmentcenter Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/X0AJnBhWbCkx/ Minds: https://www.minds.com/TenthAmendmentCenter LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@TenthAmendmentCenter The post Supreme Court, Precedent and the Constitution first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center Blog.
