What is your view on publication pressure and challenges? Publish or Perish!
Our speakers, Professor Taofeeq Ibn-Mohammed and Dr David Fadiran boast an impressive publication record with over 25 impact factor-rated scientific publications, including book chapters. They bring immense experience and insight to the discussion.
Key Discussion Points:
1. Views on 'Publication Pressure' in academia and its impact on international recognition, resume building, and project input.
2. Personal experiences navigating publication pressure and maintaining mental health and well-being.
3. The importance of publishing working papers instead of abandoning rejected papers.
4. Thoughts on journal ratings, citations, and metrics, and how they impact researchers emotionally.
5. The influence of journals and metrics on publication pressure and potential biases in the review process.
6. Advice for overcoming rejections from top journals for postgraduate students and young researchers.
7. Recommendations for improving journal acceptance rates and suggestions for researchers, journal managers, and reviewers.
8. Insights into the reviewer selection process and opinions on the lack of financial compensation for reviewers.
Our speakers, Professor Taofeeq Ibn-Mohammed and Dr David Fadiran boast an impressive publication record with over 25 impact factor-rated scientific publications, including book chapters. They bring immense experience and insight to the discussion.
Key Discussion Points:
1. Views on 'Publication Pressure' in academia and its impact on international recognition, resume building, and project input.
2. Personal experiences navigating publication pressure and maintaining mental health and well-being.
3. The importance of publishing working papers instead of abandoning rejected papers.
4. Thoughts on journal ratings, citations, and metrics, and how they impact researchers emotionally.
5. The influence of journals and metrics on publication pressure and potential biases in the review process.
6. Advice for overcoming rejections from top journals for postgraduate students and young researchers.
7. Recommendations for improving journal acceptance rates and suggestions for researchers, journal managers, and reviewers.
8. Insights into the reviewer selection process and opinions on the lack of financial compensation for reviewers.