E66 Forensic Failures


Episode Artwork
1.0x
0% played 00:00 00:00
Aug 15 2024 58 mins   1

If you thought last week’s episode about Fred Zain was disturbing, then buckle up! This week we take a look at other forensic “experts” who have made a name for themselves in all the wrong ways. Listen now to hear about these forensic failures and the associated fallout.


If you listened to this episode, thanks for joining us on the Brothers in Crime podcast! If you liked it, please subscribe, tell a friend, and leave a review!


Whether you liked it or not, we welcome your feedback! You can find us on our website www.brothersincrimepodcast.com or the following socials:


Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrothersInCrimePodcast


Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brothersincrimepodcast/


X https://twitter.com/Brosincrimepod


YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@brothersincrimepodcast


The following are links to some of the resources or references we discussed during or reviewed in preparation for this episode:


Below is a list of defendants who were wrongly convicted based on misconduct by Joyce Gilchrist, a forensic chemist with the Oklahoma City Police Dept


Former forensic scientist, accused of forging evidence in hundreds of cases, dies


https://web.archive.org/web/20090428095752/http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,109568,00.html


Police Chemist Accused of Shoddy Work Is Fired - The New York Times


4 Crimes That Inspired Law & Order Episodes | Mental Floss


McCARTY v. GILCHRIST (2011) | FindLaw


Man gets $4 million over wrong rape conviction


OKC man walks free after 1992 murder conviction vacated


crime lab scandal | The Marshall Project


Colorado Bureau of Investigation finds DNA scientist manipulated data in hundreds of cases over decades


CBI: Forensic Scientist Manipulated Over 650 Cases


Scientist Mary Jane Burton faces allegations she altered crime evidence - Axios Richmond


Admissible


Please note that our podcast is for entertainment purposes only.


Nothing said in this episode should be construed as legal advice. Our comments and opinions are exactly that, and they are strictly and solely the opinion of each host and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person or entity unless explicitly stated.