Recess Appointments: Forgotten Constitutional Limits from the Founders


Episode Artwork
1.0x
0% played 00:00 00:00
Feb 03 2025 35 mins   16

Even Alexander Hamilton – no opponent of big, centralized government – held a far more restrictive view of executive power on “recess appointments” than most politicians and judges today. That tells you just how far things have gone off the rails. In this episode, we’re breaking down one of the most misunderstood parts of the Constitution – the Recess Appointments Clause. We’ll cover how the Founders viewed the clause, what they meant by recess, adjournment, and happen, and three key takeaways that expose how modern practices have strayed from the Constitution’s original design.


Path to Liberty: February 3, 2025



Subscribe: Apple | Spotify | Podbean | Youtube Music | Stitcher | TuneIn | RSS | More Platforms Here



SHOW LINKS:

JOIN TAC


Show Archives


Constitution: Article II, Section 2, Clause 2-3


Michael Rappaport – The Original Meaning of the Recess Appointments Clause


Alexander Hamilton – Federalist 67 (11 Mar 1788)


Edmund Randolph – Opinion on Recess Appointments (7 July 1792)


Rob Natelson – The Evidence Continues to Pile Up on “Recess Appointments”


Massachusetts Constitution, Part 2, Chapter II, Section I, Article V (1780)


New Hampshire Constitution, Part 2, Article 34 (1784)


St. George Tucker – View of the Constitution of the United States (1803)


READING LIST



MORE VIDEO SOURCES

Watch on Rumble


Watch on Odysee


Watch on X


Watch on Minds


Watch on Facebook


Watch on Bitchute


Watch on Brighteon


Watch on LinkedIn


Watch on TikTok


Watch on Spotify


FOLLOW and SUPPORT TAC:


Become a Member: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/

Email Newsletter: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/register

RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/tacdailydigest


The post Recess Appointments: Forgotten Constitutional Limits from the Founders first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.