A Critique of the MOST Common Amillennial Recapitulation Argument in the Book of Revelation


Episode Artwork
1.0x
0% played 00:00 00:00
Feb 17 2025 27 mins   6

Dr. Alan Kurschner critiqued the most common Amillennial argument in the book of Revelation using Greg Beale’s restated argument from William Hendricksen. Amillennialists believe that Revelation 20:1–6 recapitulates Revelation 12:7–11 as occurring during the interadvent period. Beale proposes seven parallels that he thinks make this argument (see the Table below). Dr. Kurschner critiques each supposed parallel one by one and demonstrates that not only are these not viable parallels, but they instead argue for progression.


 


————-


TABLE 41. Greg Beale’s Supposed Amillennial Parallels outlined. Excerpt from A Linguistic Approach to Revelation 19:11—20:6 and the Millennial Binding of Satan (page 163) by Alan E. Kurschner


TABLE 41. Greg Beale's Supposed Amillennial Parallels outlined. Excerpt from A Linguistic Approach to Revelation 19:11—20:6 and the Millennial Binding of Satan (page 163) by Alan E. Kurschner
TABLE 41. Greg Beale’s Supposed Amillennial Parallels outlined. Excerpt from A Linguistic Approach to Revelation 19:11—20:6 and the Millennial Binding of Satan (page 163) by Alan E. Kurschner

 


 


Become a monthly supporter:


Become an Eschatos Partner by Giving Monthly



The post A Critique of the MOST Common Amillennial Recapitulation Argument in the Book of Revelation appeared first on ESCHATOS MINISTRIES.