Auralnauts Podcast

Welcome to our new reoccurring series How Has it Aged. We take a look at sci-fi films that tried to tackle predicting the future and we see how close they got. With the release of Furiosa looming, we thought we'd go back and rewatch all three Mel Gibson Mad Max films and see how they've aged. We're in for a stinky, greasy and raggedy time.

We try to have an entertaining discussion about Alex Garland's "Civil War", but it's such a dour film that we had no choice but to call in Zack Snyder's "Rebel Moon - Part 2: The Scargiver" as a comedy lifeline.

As we reach the zenith of the reboot sequel age, we reboot the sequel to our podcast in order to talk about all the Ghostbusters.

Welcome to the FUTURE, where it's just the 80s but with rolling lunch boxes that might kill you if the lead singer of KISS has anything to say about it. Does that make no sense? Well, good thing we do an entire podcast about it.

Seanbaby returns to the podcast to help Zak unlock the answers behind what makes Dolph Lundgren possibly THE most Japanese person to ever exist.

Vulture writer and pro wrestling expert Anne Clark joins Zak to try and figure out what part of "No Holds Barred" took its Rotten Tomato score from zero to ten percent.

Dive into the futuristic hellscape of 1999, where violence runs rampant in schools and the government is powerless to do anything about it. What a random, irrelevant topic! I promise it actually is more fun that it sounds.

If Sammo Hung and Jackie Chan can get away with making Heart of Dragon, surely talking about it is fair game, right? 1-900-Hotdog's Robert Brockway joins Zak to find out.

Craven slams back into the podcast like one of Jack Elam's mystery needles. Oh no, we've laced the episode description with a callback from the episode itself. You better start listening now in order to prevent a reference paradox.

We're joined this episode by 1-900-Hotdog's Seanbaby to discuss whether or not a classic comedy has aged well or not. What does aging well mean? It could mean several different things. Do characters use gay slurs to indicate dissatisfaction? Does a killer incapacitate his victims by cutting a phone line? Is a floppy disk the focal point of an entire plot? I don't know, but at this